Prv8 Shell
Server : Apache/2.2.22 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.22 OpenSSL/1.0.0-fips mod_auth_passthrough/2.1 mod_bwlimited/1.4
System : Linux server.jackjohnson.com 2.6.32-279.5.2.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Aug 24 01:07:11 UTC 2012 x86_64
User : jackjohn ( 502)
PHP Version : 5.3.17
Disable Function : NONE
Directory :  /home/jackjohn/mail/jackjohnson.com/jackjohnson/cur/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Current File : /home/jackjohn/mail/jackjohnson.com/jackjohnson/cur/1349317088.003757.mbox:2,
Return-Path: <MAILER-DAEMON@jackjohnson.nethosting.com>
Received: from localhost (localhost)
	by jackjohnson.nethosting.com (8.14.4/8.13.6) id p61374f0002150;
	Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:07:08 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:07:08 -0600 (MDT)
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON>
Message-Id: <201107010307.p61374f0002150@jackjohnson.nethosting.com>
To: postmaster
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
	boundary="p61374f0002150.1309489628/jackjohnson.nethosting.com"
Subject: Postmaster notify: see transcript for details
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (postmaster-notification)

This is a MIME-encapsulated message

--p61374f0002150.1309489628/jackjohnson.nethosting.com

The original message was received at Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:07:04 -0600 (MDT)
from localhost
with id p61374ex002150

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<rdyz@idmi.com>
    (reason: 550 No such user (rdyz@idmi.com))

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to barracuda.idmi.com.:
>>> DATA
<<< 550 No such user (rdyz@idmi.com)
550 5.1.1 <rdyz@idmi.com>... User unknown
<<< 503 Bad sequence of commands

--p61374f0002150.1309489628/jackjohnson.nethosting.com
Content-Type: message/delivery-status

Reporting-MTA: dns; jackjohnson.nethosting.com
Received-From-MTA: DNS; pc-204-64-120-200.cm.vtr.net
Arrival-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:07:04 -0600 (MDT)

Final-Recipient: RFC822; rdyz@idmi.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; barracuda.idmi.com
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 No such user (rdyz@idmi.com)
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:07:08 -0600 (MDT)

--p61374f0002150.1309489628/jackjohnson.nethosting.com
Content-Type: message/rfc822

Return-Path: <MAILER-DAEMON>
Received: from localhost (localhost)
	by jackjohnson.nethosting.com (8.14.4/8.13.6) id p61374ex002150;
	Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:07:04 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:07:04 -0600 (MDT)
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON>
Message-Id: <201107010307.p61374ex002150@jackjohnson.nethosting.com>
To: <rdyz@idmi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
	boundary="p61374ex002150.1309489624/jackjohnson.nethosting.com"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)

This is a MIME-encapsulated message

--p61374ex002150.1309489624/jackjohnson.nethosting.com

The original message was received at Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:07:02 -0600 (MDT)
from pc-204-64-120-200.cm.vtr.net [200.120.64.204]

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<hcerny@jackjohnson.com>
    (reason: 550 Recipient Rejected: No account by that name here)

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to ismtp.livebooks.everyone.net.:
>>> DATA
<<< 550 Recipient Rejected: No account by that name here
550 5.1.1 <hcerny@jackjohnson.com>... User unknown
<<< 554 No valid recipients specified

--p61374ex002150.1309489624/jackjohnson.nethosting.com
Content-Type: message/delivery-status

Reporting-MTA: dns; jackjohnson.nethosting.com
Received-From-MTA: DNS; pc-204-64-120-200.cm.vtr.net
Arrival-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:07:02 -0600 (MDT)

Final-Recipient: RFC822; Hans@bryanbowenarchitects.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Remote-MTA: DNS; ismtp.livebooks.everyone.net
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Recipient Rejected: No account by that name here
Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:07:04 -0600 (MDT)

--p61374ex002150.1309489624/jackjohnson.nethosting.com
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Return-Path: <rdyz@idmi.com>
Received: from pc-204-64-120-200.cm.vtr.net (pc-204-64-120-200.cm.vtr.net [200.120.64.204])
	by jackjohnson.nethosting.com (8.14.4/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p61371ex002085
	for <hcerny@jackjohnson.com>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:07:02 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from [124.184.137.146] ([171.157.169.110] helo=localhost.localdomain)
	by smtp1.tzlnah.com (envelope-from <rdyz@idmi.com>)
	(ecelerity 3.0.22.470272 r(68031)) with ESMTP
	id 61qf-92-352F000w7; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 11:00:23 +0100
To: hcerny@jackjohnson.com
Message-Id: <201107012104.XDMUPZ53@ffuy.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 11:00:23 +0100
Sender: rdyz@idmi.com
From: "Max Gentleman" <rdyz@idmi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: MaxGentleman Enlargement Pills
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

http://pvfc.peacebanana.ru


MaxGentleman Enlargement Pills have been featured across major media outlets around the world, including ESP and Fox News, with dozens of positive reviews.
This is the only Male enlargement supplement that has been PROVEN in clinical trials to enlarge your penis – safely, quickly, and importantly – PERMANENTLY.
Here were the results in 5,000 randomized male subjects who took MaxGentleman for 6 months:

 

    * Increase in penis length by 1-3 inches
    * Increase in penis width by 20%.
    * Aids in preventing Premature Ejaculation.
    * Achieved longer, rock hard erections
    * All gains in penis length and width were 100% permanent

MaxGentleman Enlargement pills are also:

    * 100% Herbal, 100% Safe
    * Doctor Approved and Recommended!
    * The only Penis Enlargement pill PROVEN in clinical trials
    * No Expensive Doctor Visit Required
    * Very Discrete packaging and billing
    * 100% Satisfaction & Money Back Guarantee
    * 3 FREE Bottles Of MaxGentleman
    * Secure State of the Art SSL Encryption.





--p61374ex002150.1309489624/jackjohnson.nethosting.com--


--p61374f0002150.1309489628/jackjohnson.nethosting.com--


haha - 2025